Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 10, 2008No. 05-07-01176-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

James Richard Norman, the respondent father in the action before the trial court, appeals from an order adjudicating parentage and ordering the payment of child support. In three issues, Norman asserts (1) the statute of limitations bars the At*921torney General’s action; (2) the trial court acted unreasonably in ordering Norman to pay retroactive child support; and (3) the trial court misapplied the statute governing child support by ordering Norman to pay current child support for the nineteen-year-old child who is being home-schooled. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Texas Education Agency v. LeeperTexas Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WolfgramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mary B. Bardouche v. Jon D. Bardouche, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2024
  3. in the Interest of S.M.-R., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API