Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex parte Ronald Eugene Hollander, Jr.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 26, 2014No. 1121121Published

1DissentMoore, Chief Justice

The Lauderdale Circuit Court denied the motion filed by Ronald Eugene Hollander, Jr., to 'withdraw his guilty plea to attempted first-degree assault. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial by an unpublished memorandum. Hollander v. State (No. CR-12-0297, May 24, 2013), 161 So.3d 1236 (Ala.Crim.App.2013) (table). Because I believe that Hollander has satisfied the legal standard for the withdrawal of a guilty plea and that the result in this case works an injustice, I dissent.

I. Facts and Procedural History

The statement of facts attached to the criminal complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte HeatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte McCormickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API