In Re Christine M. MIRE
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Dissent · WeimerWeimer, J.
LI respectfully dissent. In this matter, we' are called, on to evaluate the rights guaranteed to this attorney pursuant to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution1 and Article 1, § 7 of the Louisiana Constitution entitled “Freedom of Expression”2 to engage in speech re*670garding public officials who serve as judges. In evaluating the rights afforded this attorney to freely engage in speech, we are not required to believe the allegations lodged about the judges or question the integrity of these judges. In dissenting, I do not question the integrity of these judges. However, we are…
Also in this document: Dissent · Weimer.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.