Legal Opinion
California ex rel. California Air Resources Board v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1985No. Nos. 82-7410, 82-7427, 82-7473, 82-7474, 84-7272 to 84-7274PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
California and Nevada each petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of the other’s state implementation plan (SIP) for attaining air quality in the Lake Tahoe Basin under the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642 (1982). The League to Save Lake Tahoe also challenges the Nevada Plan.1
The bone of contention which precipitated this feud is the proposed construction of two casino parking garages in the town of South Lake Tahoe. If completed, they would increase the legal number of parking spaces available in the town by twenty to twenty-five…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Sierra Club v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, National Coal Association, Alabama Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- City of Seabrook, Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mark Abramowitz v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Coalition Against Columbus Center v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- State of California, Ex Rel. State of California Air Resources Board and California Resources Agency the California Department of Transportation: California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States, and Anne M. Gorsuch, in Her Capacity as Administrator, Etc., Department of Conservation & Natural Resources of the State of Nevada, Respondent-Intervenor. League to Save Lake Tahoe, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States, and Anne M. Gorsuch, in Her Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Nevada, Ex Rel. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States and William H. Ruckelshaus, in His Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of California, Ex Rel. John K. Van De Kamp, in His Capacity as State Attorney General, and League to Save Lake Tahoe, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States and William D. Ruckelshaus, in His Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Nevada, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985