Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. Docket Nos. 96876, 96877, (Calendar No. 5)Published

1DissentCavanagh, C.J.

I respectfully dissent because my review of the record reveals sufficient probable cause to support bindover. The complainant testified that he had been offered up to five or six thousand dollars for the watch. He testified that he told the defendants that he did not want to sell *565the watch. He testified further that the defendants agreed to enter into a loan or pawn transaction, and that the defendants told him that they would use a buy/sell arrangement to avoid the legal requirements of pawn transactions.1 The district court found probable cause that the transaction was either a loan or a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Boyd v. LayherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API