Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Dabrowski

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered February 2, 1994 reversed, with $10 costs, tenants’ motion to vacate the warrant of eviction is denied, and the consent final judgment entered pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement is reinstated.

On a previous appeal in this proceeding, this court affirmed Civil Court’s order denying tenants’ motion to vacate a stipulation executed in settlement of a nonpayment proceeding. We took note that "tenants, who were represented by counsel at the time of the stipulation, agreed to vacate this luxury apartment * * * on June 30, 1992, and received…

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Pierre Associates v. MankowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. FS 41-45 Tiemann Place LLC v. EstrellaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
  3. 123 West 15, LLC v. ComptonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  4. Houston St. Mgt. Co. v. La CroixAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  5. Related Broadway Dev. LLC v. MaloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API