Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. McKiernan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided December 31, 2002No. 1259 DR 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, J.,

This unusual action arose when plaintiff filed for child support claiming that the defendant was the putative father of the twin boys plaintiff gave birth to on August 25, 1994. On February 7, 2000, defendant filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer arguing that at the time the children were conceived, the plaintiff was married to her then husband, Paul S. Ferguson. Defendant also argued that Mr. Ferguson was named as the father on the birth certificates and that the plaintiff gave the children his last name, thus invoking the presumption that Mr. Ferguson was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cardamone v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Egyptian Sands Real Estate, Inc. v. PolonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Hillcrest Foundation, Inc. v. McFeatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Kesler v. WenigerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. McKiernanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Ferguson v. McKiernanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API