Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1939No. 2169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

Charles Parcus, G. W. Howard, G. W. Lehman, Pete Machacek, and Frank Baca executed a promissory note to one Mrs. M. O. Britt. Lehman died and claim for the amount of the note was duly presented to his administrators and paid in the course of administration. Thereafter, Lehman’s administrators brought this suit against G. W. Howard for contribution, it being alleged that Parcus was principal on the note and that the other four obligors were co-sureties. It was alleged that Par-cus, Machacek and Baca were insolvent, and consequently they were not joined as defendants in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ivy v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Hadley v. UpshawTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Wyatt v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Comstock v. KeatingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pruett v. First Nat. Bank of TempleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Corbell v. KoogCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. McCormick v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Chandler v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Patton v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API