Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1936No. 25919. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

—Respondent, L. H. Woodard, while within the protection of the workmen’s compensation act, suffered an injury, for which, in his opinion, he was entitled to receive compensation, and he accordingly filed a claim with the department of labor and industries, asking for appropriate relief. August 28, 1933, the supervisor denied the claim,

“ . . . for the reason that there is no proof of an accident in the course of employment and no proof that the hernia was sustained during the course of employment as alleged.”

Mr. Woodard requested and received a rehearing before the joint board, which, under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Powers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Labor & Industries v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lenk v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Albrecht v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. DeStoop v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Target Corp. v. Patrisia VowelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API