Legal Opinion

Detoro v. Pittston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1944No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Dbew,

TMs is a mandamus proceeding brought by plaintiff, Albert Detoro, to compel Pittston, a city of the third class, to reinstate him as a policeman and reimburse him for wages lost through his dismissal from the force. It is the second trial of the case. In the first trial there was a directed verdict for plaintiff, which was affirmed by the court en banc and the Superior Court. An allocatur was allowed and this Court (344 Pa. 254, 25 A. 2d 299), reversed the judgment with a venire facias de novo on the ground that certain evidence offered by defendant was improperly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCartney v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Detoro v. PittstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Manning v. Millbourne Borough Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Resnick v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Kos v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Snizaski v. ZaleskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API