Legal Opinion
Hudson-Spring Partnership, L.P. v. P+M Design Consultants, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J), entered April 8, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend its complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant P+M Design Consultants, Inc.’s (P+M) argument that the second through fourth causes of action in the amended complaint are barred by res judicata is without merit. Res judicata requires a final judgment in a prior action (see e.g. People v Evans, 94 NY2d 499, 502 [2000]; UBS Sec. LLC v Highland Capital Mgt., L.P., 86 AD3d 469, 473-474 [1st Dept…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georgia Malone & Co. v. RiederNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- MBIA Insurance v. Greystone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- UBS Securities LLC v. Highland Capital Management, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- 14 Second Avenue Realty Corp. v. Anne Steven Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hudson Spring Partners, L.P. v. P & M Design Consultants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Hudson Spring Partners, L.P. v. P & M Design Consultants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Eshaghian v. EshaghianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019