Welton v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
We review a trial court's decision whether to admit expert testimony under an abuse of discretion standard, only reversing if the record shows clearly that the witness was qualified. Sami v. Varn, 260 Va. 280, 284, 535 S.E.2d 172, 174 (2000) ; Landis v. Commonwealth, 218 Va. 797, 800, 241 S.E.2d 749, 750-51 (1978). Expert opinion may be admitted to assist the fact finder if such opinion satisfies certain requirements, "including the requirement of an adequate factual foundation." Forbes v. Rapp, 269 Va. 374, 381, 611 S.E.2d 592, 596 (2005) ; Va. R. Evid. 2:702 and 2:703. As we have stated,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forbes v. RappSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Sami v. VarnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Swiney v. OverbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority v. Blake Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.