Legal Opinion

Mills Lumber Co. v. Heard

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1931No. 5 Div. 830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This was a suit by appellees, aided by attachment on certain lumber, against appellant, seeking the recovery of wages, alleged to have been earned by them, etc., in manufacturing, etc., the said lumber. Code 1923, §§ 8901, 8904.

The case was tried below before the court sitting without a jury. For the purposes of our review, his findings, of course, have the force and effect of a jury’s verdict.

But the judgment cannot stand. The undisputed testimony is that each of the apr pellees was employed by, worked for, and is due his wages from, one Stewart, who, as an independent contractor, cut, from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borden v. King Mill & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Mathers v. BarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Allen v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindsey Lumber & Export Co. v. FaileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Bracey v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API