Tuttle v. Moody Son
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Hemphill County. Tuttle & Harrell sued Moody & Son and had judgment for a small amount from which they prosecuted error. The judgment being affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, they obtained writ of error from' the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This writ of error was granted because of apparent error in the admission of certain testimony of the witness Walsh at the trial in the District Court, but the record, when understood, fails to show that there was error.
The action was for damages for breach of a contract whereby the defendants agreed to pasture cattle for the plaintiffs in order to fatten them for market, furnishing for the purpose sufficient grass and water. The breach alleged was the failure to furnish sufficient water. One of the consequences averred to have resulted was that the cattle did not…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. HaddadTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Wells v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Missouri, K & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WashburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Wilson v. Avery Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Reynolds v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.