Holladay v. Hodge
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Bowman, J., Manning, January, 1915. Action on bond by Joseph Holladay against Joseph N. Hodge and others. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Before Bowman, J., Manning, January, 1915. Action on bond by Joseph Holladay against Joseph N. Hodge and others. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. The order under which the bond was given, and the bond in question, were as follows: The defendants moved before me at my chambers, in Marion, South Carolina, for an order staying the operation of the order appointing a receiver in the above entitled cause, pending the appeal therefrom to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. After hearing argument on behalf of the motion, and after a…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gage.
Plaintiff sued defendant on a bond and the Circuit Court directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
The bond was made pursuant to an order of Mr. Justice Woods, and the only issue before the Circuit Court was had the bond been breached.
The cause has been much litigated. See 84 S. C. 91, 65 S. E. 952; 84 S. C. 109, 65 S. E. 1019, and 90 S. C. 106, 72 S. E. 884. The history of it, therefore, needs not to be much repeated in this, place.
The plaintiff was a farm laborer, he worked the defendant’s lands in 1908, he was not paid; he sued the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holladay v. HodgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Holladay v. HodgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Holliday v. HodgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937