Legal Opinion

Hall v. State ex rel. Renard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1898No. 9839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Burt county. Tried below before Keysor, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

The error alleged in this proceeding was the allowance of a writ of mandamus by the district court of Burt county. By assignment, the relator was the holder of a written instrument of the following form:

“No. 10. State oe Nebraska, Btjrt County. $2,670.50.
“Tekamau, July 5th, 1889.
“Treasurer of Burt County: Pay A. E. Wyckoff, or bearer, tAventy-six hundred seventy and fifty-six one-hundredths dollars, and charge to account of Peterson ditch fund. - L. J. Malmesten,
“Go. Clerk.
“T. E. Hall,
“Oh. Board Com’rs.’'

This warrant was presented to the county treasurer and indorsed not paid for want…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. ThummelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Palmer v. VanceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seng v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hoy v. Drainage District Number Thirty-FourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API