Legal Opinion

Meschino v. Lowery

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1972PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The procedures outlined by the board of trustees in its letter of November 6, 1970 affording petitioners an opportunity to present evidence are proper and sufficient. In the procedures so formulated we find implicit the additional and essential right of petitioners to be advised of the evidence against them and of the board of trustees ’ final determination, in such form as to permit adequate judicial review. Petitioners’ reliance upon Goldberg v. Kelly (397 U. S. 254) is mistaken. There, the court dealt with the ' ‘ desperate ’ ’ situation of an “ eligible ” welfare recipient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Basciano v. HerkimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Basciano v. HerkimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Kew Gardens Sanitarium, Inc. v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. COLSON ON BEHALF OF COLSON v. SillmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API