Employment Security Commission v. Arrow Plating Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.
Basically the facts of this case are not disputed. Before and including Friday, Febru*326ary 5, 1965, Frank C. Beck was doing business as the Wade Boring Works in Hamtramck, Michigan. On that Friday, Mr. Beck sold much of the assets of Wade Boring to Arrow Plating Company, Inc., for $15,500. The main asset of Wade Boring seems to have been the right of possession of the building leased by Wade Boring. This was true because the city of Hamtramck allowed the flushing of waste chemicals into the public sewer system, a distinct economic advantage in the plating business because of difficulty in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Valley Metal Products Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Russ Dawson, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cornwall Industries, Inc. v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs, Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Easy Street West v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Astral Industries, Inc. v. Indiana Employment Security BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- James v. McCoy Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- State v. Gibson's BarbecueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.