Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Cluskey

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 19, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The purpose of the amendment to section 257 of the Surrogate’s Court Act made by chapter 490 of the Laws of 1938, in the enactment of which this court, as an individual, was an interested and an active party, is fully reflected in the note accompanying the bill which was before the Legislature at the time of the enactment. It may consequently be deemed to demonstrate the legislative intent in the promulgation of this remedial legislation. (Matter of Derry, 161 Misc. 135, 137, and authorities cited.)

The evil to be corrected was to supply a remedy for the situation disclosed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of DerryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeidbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. Larkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  3. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of MorriseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of HutchinsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API