Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Trullinger & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1892No. Appeal, No. 84PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 84, July T., 1891, by defendants, Geo. Trullinger, Geo. Pancake and Alfred Pancake, trading as Geo. Trullinger & Co., from decree of C. P. Centre Co., Aug. T., 1882, No. 133, for plaintiff, in bill for conveyance or account, by Wilbur F. Reeder, administrator of Geo. M. Hertline, deceased. Bill to compel conveyance or for account. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 84, July T., 1891, by defendants, Geo. Trullinger, Geo. Pancake and Alfred Pancake, trading as Geo. Trullinger & Co., from decree of C. P. Centre Co., Aug. T., 1882, No. 133, for plaintiff, in bill for conveyance or account, by Wilbur F. Reeder, administrator of Geo. M. Hertline, deceased. Bill to compel conveyance or for account. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The bill was filed by Hertline, who died pending the suit, and his administrator was substituted. The case was referred to D. F. Fortney, as master, who filed a report recommending that the bill be…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Heydbick,

The first error assigned, and that to which the arguments of counsel were mainly directed, is that the learned court below, reversing the master, found that the deed of George R. Boak and wife to the defendants, though absolute upon its face, was intended as a security for the payment of money. Counsel do not differ as to the principles by which the court should have been guided when dealing with the question involved in this finding. On the one hand it is conceded that a deed made before the passage of the act of June 8,1881, though in form absolute, may be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Masson & Besanson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Plumer v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Fessler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  4. Todd v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. FehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Glen Manufacturing Co. v. GlatfelterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Behanna v. Polachek, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API