Legal Opinion
McCOMB, EX'R v. COMMISSIONERS, ETC.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 25, 1875No. 4PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
91 U.S. 1 (____)
McCOMB, EXECUTOR,
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF KNOX COUNTY, OHIO.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. W.H. Smith for the defendant in error. No counsel appeared for the plaintiff in error.
2Opinion of the Court · WaiteChief Justice Waite
The Commissioners of Knox County having sued McComb in the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County, he filed an answer to their petition, to which they demurred, alleging for cause that it did not contain facts sufficient to bar the action. This demurrer was overruled, and replies were thereupon filed. McComb then demurred to the replies, because the facts stated did not constitute a defence to the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- McComb v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Parcels v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
4Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Ft. Dodge Portland Cement Corp. v. MonkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Cobb v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- United States Mortgage & Tr. Co. v. AndersonLucas Circuit Court · 1908