Legal Opinion

Parry v. Parry

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to amended complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBoss, J.

The defendant H. Barrow Parry, individually and also as surviving partner of the firm of W. B. Parry & Sons, and the defendant W. B. Parry & Son, Inc., severally and jointly demur to the amended complaint upon the ground that there is a defect of parties in not making the personal representatives of William B. Parry parties, and, second, failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint, after alleging the residence of the parties, alleges as follows: “ that on or about January 15, 1909, plaintiff, defendant H. Barrow Parry, and one William B. Parry, now…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Voorhis v. . Childs'New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Barnes v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Marquand v. President of New-York Manufacturing Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1820
  5. McGregor v. . McGregorNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scaglione v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API