Mississippi Medicaid Pharmaceutical Average Wholesale Price Litigation v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentLamar, Justice
¶ 56. Because the State wholly'failed to prove fraud or a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, I dissent. But before I can discuss the merits of this decision, I must provide necessary evidence omitted from Justice Chandler’s opinion.
¶ 57. The State claims that Mississippi’s Division of Medicaid (Medicaid) over-reimbursed pharmacies for certain generic drugs because manufacturers intentionally published a price — called the Average Wholesale Price, or AWP — for its drugs that whs not an actual average arid was higher than it should have been.' Specifically, the State claims that, because…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen v. Mac Tools, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Franklin v. Lovitt Equipment Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Nichols v. Tri-State Brick and Tile Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Martin v. WinfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Boling v. A-1 Detective & Patrol Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.