Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mississippi Medicaid Pharmaceutical Average Wholesale Price Litigation v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2015No. 2012-CA-01610-SCTPublished

1DissentLamar, Justice

¶ 56. Because the State wholly'failed to prove fraud or a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, I dissent. But before I can discuss the merits of this decision, I must provide necessary evidence omitted from Justice Chandler’s opinion.

¶ 57. The State claims that Mississippi’s Division of Medicaid (Medicaid) over-reimbursed pharmacies for certain generic drugs because manufacturers intentionally published a price — called the Average Wholesale Price, or AWP — for its drugs that whs not an actual average arid was higher than it should have been.' Specifically, the State claims that, because…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. Mac Tools, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Franklin v. Lovitt Equipment Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nichols v. Tri-State Brick and Tile Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Martin v. WinfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Boling v. A-1 Detective & Patrol Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API