Dare v. Frost
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKaren R. Baker, Justice
I concur with the majority's holding that the circuit court did not err in declining to impute additional income to Frost. However, because the circuit court erred in modifying visitation and failing to properly calculate child support in this matter, I dissent from the remainder of the majority's opinion. First, with regard to visitation, based on the record before the court, the circuit court clearly erred in modifying visitation. Courts impose a more stringent standard for modifications in visitation.
*286Brown v. Brown , 2012 Ark. 89, 387 S.W.3d 159. The reasons for requiring these more…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helvering v. BruunSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- McWhorter v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Evans v. TillerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.