Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Murcambyr, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SEXTON, Judge.
In this suit on several promissory notes and accompanying continuing guaranties, the defendants appeal a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Therein the trial court held: service of process was sufficient; defendant sureties had no right to collaterally attack a default judgment rendered against the corporate principal where it was found that the sureties had bound themselves in solido; that plaintiff had sufficiently proved its claim as to amounts owed by defendants; and that the judgment against defendants is in proper form since it does, on its face, specify an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Prevot v. CourtneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Rue v. MessmerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Gamble v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murdock v. Brittco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Murcambyr, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982