Legal Opinion

Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Murcambyr, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1982No. 14947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEXTON, Judge.

In this suit on several promissory notes and accompanying continuing guaranties, the defendants appeal a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Therein the trial court held: service of process was sufficient; defendant sureties had no right to collaterally attack a default judgment rendered against the corporate principal where it was found that the sureties had bound themselves in solido; that plaintiff had sufficiently proved its claim as to amounts owed by defendants; and that the judgment against defendants is in proper form since it does, on its face, specify an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Prevot v. CourtneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  4. Rue v. MessmerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Gamble v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murdock v. Brittco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Murcambyr, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API