Legal Opinion
Board of Supervisors v. Moland Development Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1975No. Appeal, Nos. 522, 523 and 537 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
Three appeals are consolidated here for our disposition. All revolve around one central issue: Is Upper Frederick Township Ordinance 60-1 a proper exercise of the authority granted to the Township by the Second Class Township Code, Act of May 1, 1933, P.L. 103, as amended, 53 P.S. §65101 et seq., or is the ordinance, as Moland Development Company (Moland) argues and the court below found, a de facto zoning ordinance, and, as such, invalid for any one of a number of reasons cited by Mo-land and the lower court?
On October 30, 1970, Moland submitted a plot plan and a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. AshenfelderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Camp Hill Development Co. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Meyers v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Whitemarsh Township v. KravitzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- McKEE ET UX. v. Twp. of MontgomeryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Borough of Malvern v. JacksonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. New Britain TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.