Legal Opinion

David Moore, Jr. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 2014No. 4D14-2723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the denial of appellant’s successive and untimely motion for postcon-viction relief. Appellant raised the same claim regarding misadvice of counsel regarding his plea in Moore v. State, 114 So.3d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). He claims that because of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), decided after Moore, he is entitled to re-raise this same claim. However, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(3) permits a claim to be raised beyond the two-year time limitation only “where the fundamental constitutional right asserted was not established within the period provided for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calderon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. David Calderon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API