Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 2011No. 4D09-556PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

We write primarily to address one issue — whether a witness’s trial testimony may be impeached by the introduction of a prior inconsistent statement when the witness says that he does not remember the earlier statement. By claiming such a lack of memory, the witness does not “distinctly admit” the prior inconsistent statement within the meaning of section 90.614(2), Florida Statutes (2009), so that extrinsic evidence of the statement is admissible as impeachment.

Rene Rodriguez, his girlfriend, the victim, and others were playing cards at night in Rodriguez’s apartment. A fight started between…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Pearce v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Lamb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faust v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. K.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API