Legal Opinion

Lawyer v. Lawyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1933No. 2239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

A petition .in error has been filed in this court, the original papers and the transcript of journal entries as well as the bill of exceptions have been filed in this court. The petition in error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the action of the court below. We have read and considered the' evidence.

This is a peculiar case and in many respects a strange and unusual case. The mother suffered from some unusual and as styled in the case a mental trouble. She went to a private institution when she was fourteen years of age, was treated for her trouble and apparently…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles v. CharlesOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Riggs v. RiggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Berry v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API