Legal Opinion
Elgin R. Parker and Flo Parker v. Harry C. Westover, Individually and as Former Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Elgin R. Parker and Flo Parker v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles, California
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1957No. 15340Published
1Opinion of the Court
248 F.2d 490
57-2 USTC P 9978
Elgin R. PARKER and Flo Parker, Appellants,
v.
Harry C. WESTOVER, individually and as Former Collector of
Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of
California, Appellee.
Elgin R. PARKER and Flo Parker, Appellants,
v.
R. A. RIDDELL, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los
Angeles, California, Appellee.
No. 15340.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 9, 1957.
Melvin D. Wilson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson, George F. Lynch, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Laughlin E. Waters,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Sam Snyder v. Harry C. Westover, Former Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Jack Smith and Rose Mae Smith v. Harry C. Westover, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, and Robert A. Riddell, Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Parker v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Thomas P. Pike and Katherine Keho Pike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.