Legal Opinion
Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 7, 2024No. 6:17-cv-01685Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION ADASA INC., Case No. 6:17-cv-01685-MK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER vs. Re: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, AS A MATTER OF LAW UNDER RULE 50(b) AND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Defendant. UNDER RULE 60(b) KASUBHAI, United States Magistrate Judge: Defendant Avery Dennison renews its motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) and requests relief from judgment from prior rulings under Rule 60(b). See generally Def.’s Mot. J. Matter Law & Mot. Relief from J., ECF No. 591 (“Def.’s JMOL”).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.