Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs have moved, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring their action to the Southern District of New York for inclusion in MDL No. 1603. Defendants Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Co., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., and P.F. Laboratories, Inc., along with The Purdue Pharma Co.; Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Inc.; and Euro-Celtique S.A. (collectively Purdue) oppose the motion to vacate.
After considering all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Pract.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
- In Re IvyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re Ephedra Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
- In Re Oxycontin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008