State v. Seebold
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Hiram N. Moore} Judge. (1) Section 3021, Revised Statutes 1899, by its plain and unmistakable provisions, confers upon the Eixcise Commissioner the power to-revoke the license of any dramshop-keeper if, in his opinion, the- laws of the State have been violated.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Hiram N. Moore} Judge. (1) Section 3021, Revised Statutes 1899, by its plain and unmistakable provisions, confers upon the Eixcise Commissioner the power to-revoke the license of any dramshop-keeper if, in his opinion, the- laws of the State have been violated. Higgins v. Talty, 157 Mo. 287. (2) This law is not a special or local law within the meaning of sections 53 and 54 of article 4 of the Constitution, for the reason that the conditions existing in large cities justified the Legislature in conferring upon the Excise Commissioner a…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
On the 26th day of May, 1905, the grand jury of the city of St. Louis preferred an indictment against the defendant Seebold, charging him with having, on the 26th day of April, 1905, unlawfully sold intoxicating liquor without a license as a dramshopkeeper. It was also charged, and is shown upon the face of the indictment, that said defendant, on or prior to the 16th day of April, 1905, was a regularly licensed dramshop-keepér, and that said license was by the Excise Commissioner revoked for the reason that defendant had violated the provisions of the law governing dramshop-keepers by keeping…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
- Shehane v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Mediation v. PiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Cofman v. OusterhousNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Gregory v. HeckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.