People v. Purifoy
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.
Defendant, Mack Purifoy, was arrested after he was seen throwing a rock at police officers on the scene of a public disorder and was convicted by a judge, sitting without a jury, of making or exciting a disturbance or contention. MCLA § 750.170 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.367). He appeals as of right claiming the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
The distinction between a challenge of vagueness and a challenge of overbreadth is well stated in Landry v. Daley (ND Ill, 1968), 280 F Supp 938, 951:
“The concept of vagueness or indefiniteness rests on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas Leonard v. Stephen Robinson, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. VandenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. GilbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. HarbourMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.