Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1911No. 3153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for manufacturing liquor; from Paulding superior court — Judge Edwards. December 14, 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, J.'

1. The case is controlled for tlie most part by the decision in tlie ease of McAdams v. State, ante, 166 (70 S. E. 893).

2. In the light of the rule that in misdemeanors all who aid or abet are principals, one who, at a place where an illicit distillery is in operation, participates by such acts as helping barrel the liquor, helping keep up the fire, and leveling tlie still worm when it is about to get out of proper adjustment, may be convicted upon an indictment charging him with manufacturing liquor. Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAdams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Geter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Cason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API