Legal Opinion

Swacker v. Wright

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint as insufficient in law. The complaint is predicated upon section 51 of the Civil Rights Law, which affords a remedy both in equity and at law to “ Any person whose name * * * is used within this state for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade without the written consent first obtained.” The plaintiff, Frank M. Swacker, is an attorney at law who has had an extensive practice, and who during the course of his career has acted as special assistant to the Attorney-General of the United States in the prosecution of *823anti-trust cases. He claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Porter v. American Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Lahiri v. Daily Mirror, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Myers v. U. S. Camera Publishing Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  4. People v. Charles Scribner's SonsNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1954
  5. Krieger v. Popular Publications, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API