Patterson v. T. L. Wallace Construction, Inc.

¶ 27. I agree with the majority that summary judgment was appropriate in favor of Turtle Creek Development, Inc., as it owed no duty to Patterson nor was it T. L. Wallace Construction’s (T. L.Wallace) employer for the purpose of respondeat superior. However, I do not agree that summary judgment was appropriate in favor of T. L. Wallace. The majority says *333that Patterson’s claims that T. L. Wallace created the dangerous condition, knew of the dangerous condition, and failed to warn of the dangerous condition, are nothing but mere speculation. With respect, I disagree. I find that Patterson has…