Legal Opinion

Rebollo v. Nicholas Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 2015No. 14167N 115289/08PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered December 17, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to direct plaintiff to appear for a further independent medical examination (IME) by a physician designated by defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Plaintiff was not required to appear for an additional IME. Although there is no restriction in CPLR 3121 limiting the number of examinations to which a plaintiff may be subjected, a defendant seeking a further examination must demonstrate the necessity for it (see Chaudhary v Gold, 83…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frangella v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Futersak v. BrinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Chaudhary v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Alcantara-Pena v. ShanahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API