Weller v. Weller
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentThomas, Justice
I do not agree with the result reached in the majority opinion, and, consequently, I must dissent. The majority opinion rejects the application of the provision for jurisdiction found in Wyo. Stat. § 20-5-104(a)(ii) (1997) because:
The record does not contain sufficient facts to establish that, when the divorce action was filed, at least one contestant had a significant connection with Wyoming or that substantial evidence was available in this state with regard to the children’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships.
*497Maj. at 495. This paraphrase is not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. DieringerWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Feaster v. FeasterWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Pellish Bros. v. CooperWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Nicholls v. NichollsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.