Legal Opinion

Actiengesellschaft Vereinigte Ultramarin-Fabriken v. Amberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 7, 1901No. 7PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

We are not able to concur in tbe conclusion that was reached by tbe court below upon the question which the learned judge of that court properly regarded as the controlling one. We agree that the complainant was not entitled to a decree restraining the defendant below from using the box and labels described in tbe bill of complaint, unless it appeared "that the complaiuant, or some one through whom it claims, was the first to adopt this particular style of dressing, and that since its adoption its usage by them has been general and continuous and exclusive;,” but our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward Baking Co. v. Potter-Wrightington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  2. Everett O. Fisk & Co. v. Fisk Teachers' Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. The Best Foods, Inc. v. Hemphill Packing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1925
  4. Lawrence v. P. E. Sharpless Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Calvert Distillers Corporation v. StockmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API