Daniels v. Daniel

I concur in affirmance on the ground that in the absence of a valid marriage between defendant and Joseph Daniel or Daniels, as behveen themselves, their heirs and their estates, no tenancy hy the entireties was created.

Like Spence v. Jones, 359 Mich 231, and Collins v. Norris, 314 Mich 145, no facts appear in this case that would bar plaintiff from contradicting the ap*190parent legal effect of the deed upon which defendant must rely.

In Spence v. Jones, supra, plaintiff was the administrator of Mack Jones. Mack Jones and defendant, with whom he had lived for a number of years prior to his death,…