Legal Opinion

Wightman v. Cottrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1913Published

Motion by the defendants, Delano D. Cottrell and another, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance after the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered by direction of the court upon a trial at the Steuben Trial Term in January, 1911.

1Opinion of the Court

Robson, J. :

This action is in ejectment. Plaintiffs’ purpose is to compel defendants to remove a one-and-one-quarter inch water main placed by defendants in the highway in front of plaintiffs’ premises. Plaintiffs’ title to the fee of the portion of the street *77in which this part of the pipe line is laid seems to be unquestioned. Defendants assert their right to maintain the pipe as laid for the following reasons:

First. That it was placed in- the street with plaintiffs’ consent and for an adequate consideration, and defendants thereby acquired -the right as to plaintiffs to maintain it in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Cary v. DeweyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API