People v. Chambers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Green, J. P., and Pine, J.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. “[W]hen potential jurors reveal knowledge or opinions reflecting a state of mind likely to preclude impartial service, they must in some form give unequivocal assurance that they can set aside any bias and render an impartial verdict based on the evidence” (People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614). The challenged prospective juror in this case expressed his bias in favor of the testimony of police officers, thus demonstrating that his state of mind was “likely to preclude him from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. BurdoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. SumpterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000