Ruff v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Movant appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under Rule 29.15. We affirm.
Movant was convicted by a jury in September 1985 of one count of sale of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.-200.1(4), RSMo Cum.Supp.1984. He was sentenced as a persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. This court affirmed Movant’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Ruff, 729 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App.1987).
On March 7, 1988, Movant filed a 'pro se motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. The motion asserted fifty-two grounds for relief. On April 20, 1988, Movant filed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Amrine v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.