Legal Opinion

Ruff v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1991No. 58558PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under Rule 29.15. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury in September 1985 of one count of sale of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.-200.1(4), RSMo Cum.Supp.1984. He was sentenced as a persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. This court affirmed Movant’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Ruff, 729 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App.1987).

On March 7, 1988, Movant filed a 'pro se motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. The motion asserted fifty-two grounds for relief. On April 20, 1988, Movant filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Amrine v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API