Legal Opinion

Hull v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1969No. 42154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, 99 years.

Appellant’s first ground of error is: “The Trial Court erred in permitting the State to offer identification testimony, subsequent to the display of pictures of the Defendant to the witnesses involved and subsequent to the placing of the Defendant in a line-up, absent counsel or an intelligent waiver thereof, under the circumstances violating the Defendant’s rights of due process under the law.”

At the trial on February 27, 1967, the complaining witness identified appellant as the man who, shortly after 10:30 P.M. on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Pierson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API