Legal Opinion

Cone v. Forest

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is an action of tort to recover the value of nine cows alleged to have been converted by the defendant to his own use. The defendant admits that he seized and sold the cows, and justifies his acts under a warrant issued to him, as collector of the town of Great Barrington, by the assessors of that town, directing him to collect a tax voted by one of the school districts of that town. At the trial it appeared by an inspection of the warrant, that to the amount voted by the district, namely 11800.11,- was added the sum of S115.16 “ for the overlaying on said tax.” The plaintiff contended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loud v. City of CharlestownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Rawson v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Hubbard v. GarfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Underwood v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGuire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Harrington v. GliddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Masonic Education & Charity Trust v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Southworth v. EdmandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API