Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 23, 2009No. CV 08-1572-RCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Eduardo Jimenez filed a complaint on March 12, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his applications for disability benefits. On August 26, 2008, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on September 30, 2008.
BACKGROUND
I
On June 20, 2002, plaintiff applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, claiming an inability to work since August 15, 2000, due to right shoulder, lower back and right knee…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Carl Edlund v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- (SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Hawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- LyBarger v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Perini v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022