Legal Opinion

State v. Whitman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 2006No. COA05-1410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Kelly M. Whitman appeals his convictions for statutory rape, statutory sex offense, indecent liberties with a child, and incest. On appeal, defendant primarily argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars; (2) allowing the State to amend the offense dates reflected on certain indictments on the day of trial and denying defendant’s subsequent motion for a continuance; (3) admitting certain photographs into evidence; (4) denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges for insufficient evidence; and (5) coercing the jury…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Brown v. Lakeside Dental CareSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fayetteville Publishing Co. v. Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. RyanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. KhouriCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API