Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Matanda, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 2009No. 3-07-0855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schmidt

Plaintiff, Paul Rogers, fell on property owned by defendant. He filed suit, alleging that defendant breached its duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of invitee's to its property and that defendant breached its duty to provide a reasonably safe means of ingress and egress for the plaintiff, a business invitee. The circuit court of Warren County granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs first amended complaint alleged that defendant “owed a duty to Plaintiff to exercise ordinary care to see that the property was reasonably…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McInturff v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Judge-Zeit v. General Parking Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Sameer v. ButtAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Krueger v. ObertoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keating v. 68th & Paxton, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. The City of Chicago v. EychanerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Delhotal v. WalMart, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  4. Pacchetti v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Rogers v. Matanda, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API