Legal Opinion

Pigford v. Veneman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 2003No. Nos. CIV.A. 97-1978(PLF), CIV.A. 98-1693(PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

The parties came before the Court for a status conference on December 11, 2002 to discuss the issues of attorneys’ fees and potential sanctions, as well as the remanded issue of modification of deadlines in certain Track B proceedings. Because the Court did not have time to address the third issue at the hearing, it held a conference call to discuss the Track B issue on December 18, 2002 that included class counsel, counsel for the government, pro bono counsel and Arbitrator Michael Lewis. Based on the parties’…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API